Please tell me your opinion about design, colors, content etc. by leaving a comment on this post. If you have an idea about what is missing, what is too much or just want to leave a compliment, please post!
Nice! I like it a lot, much better than the pure Wiki.
Two things are lacking:
we need a link to the wiki
Why the blue background again? All out pages become more and more sterile and cool blue, like the ICP page. We are not a hospital, are we? Personally, I would opt for the warmer, friendlier light brown still.
I don’t think it is important to point that out. Those people that are interested in the specific cover will click on it and get more information, and those that are just looking for more information have the “Read more…” button.
It’s a very suddle thing but the main navigation bar seems unsymmetric to me in the vertical direction. You can clearly see it around the search bar. Adding a little padding on the top would fix it.
4 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
olenz
January 13, 2012 at 17:13 (UTC 1) Link to this comment
Nice! I like it a lot, much better than the pure Wiki.
Two things are lacking:
pkosovan
January 31, 2012 at 15:47 (UTC 1) Link to this comment
I like it. The menus work very nice now. You’ve done a good job.
I just would like to point out that it is not obvious that the nature cover is clickable and leads to a bigger showcase.
peter
olenz
January 31, 2012 at 15:50 (UTC 1) Link to this comment
I don’t think it is important to point that out. Those people that are interested in the specific cover will click on it and get more information, and those that are just looking for more information have the “Read more…” button.
Georg
February 1, 2012 at 19:10 (UTC 1) Link to this comment
It’s a very suddle thing but the main navigation bar seems unsymmetric to me in the vertical direction. You can clearly see it around the search bar. Adding a little padding on the top would fix it.