<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ESPResSo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://espressomd.org/wordpress/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://espressomd.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Extensible Software Package for the Research on Soft Matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:10:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Criticism please! by Georg</title>
		<link>http://espressomd.org/wordpress/criticism-please/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Georg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espressomd.org/wordpress/?p=184#comment-7</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very suddle thing but the main navigation bar seems unsymmetric to me in the vertical direction. You can clearly see it around the search bar. Adding a little padding on the top would fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very suddle thing but the main navigation bar seems unsymmetric to me in the vertical direction. You can clearly see it around the search bar. Adding a little padding on the top would fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Criticism please! by olenz</title>
		<link>http://espressomd.org/wordpress/criticism-please/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>olenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espressomd.org/wordpress/?p=184#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it is important to point that out. Those people that are interested in the specific cover will click on it and get more information, and those that are just looking for more information have the &quot;Read more...&quot; button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it is important to point that out. Those people that are interested in the specific cover will click on it and get more information, and those that are just looking for more information have the &#8220;Read more&#8230;&#8221; button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Criticism please! by pkosovan</title>
		<link>http://espressomd.org/wordpress/criticism-please/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>pkosovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espressomd.org/wordpress/?p=184#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I like it. The menus work very nice now. You&#039;ve done a good job.

I just would like to point out that it is not obvious that the nature cover is clickable and leads to a bigger showcase.

peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. The menus work very nice now. You&#8217;ve done a good job.</p>
<p>I just would like to point out that it is not obvious that the nature cover is clickable and leads to a bigger showcase.</p>
<p>peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Criticism please! by olenz</title>
		<link>http://espressomd.org/wordpress/criticism-please/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>olenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://espressomd.org/wordpress/?p=184#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Nice! I like it a lot, much better than the pure Wiki. 
Two things are lacking:
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;we need a link to the wiki&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Why the blue background again? All out pages become more and more sterile and cool blue, like the ICP page. We are not a hospital, are we? Personally, I would opt for the warmer, friendlier light brown still.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! I like it a lot, much better than the pure Wiki.<br />
Two things are lacking:</p>
<ul>
<li>we need a link to the wiki</li>
<li>Why the blue background again? All out pages become more and more sterile and cool blue, like the ICP page. We are not a hospital, are we? Personally, I would opt for the warmer, friendlier light brown still.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

